An issue of In Context magazine was exploring the idea that these times require a "New Story" in which David Spangler, who wrote the book Emergence, The Rebirth Of The Sacred contributed an article entitled, "The New Storytellers: How we live the story is as important as its content.” The old story no longer serves us. This article explored the idea and that we become the “New Storytellers” in order to tell (and live) this new, emerging story.
It is asking that we not only craft a new story for ourselves, but that we use interactive, improvisational methods do so. The new story is cocreative and participative. It is asking us to come from new ways of being, thinking and imagining. It requires us to be innovative, open, pattern breaking and new paradigm making. It requires us to work, communicate and interact differently. And it requires us to become conscious cocreators with what is emerging. I have included just a short excerpt and highly recommend the full article, found at http://www.context.org/ICLIB/IC12/Spangler.htm
The lecture/story dichotomy is not the only way of examining this metaphor of the New Story. Another is to look at the kind of stories that can exist. A story can excite us, involving us subjectively and imaginatively, and still leave us in the position of being a relatively passive audience. On the other hand, a story can be structured and told in such a way as to demand our direct involvement in its unfoldment. A good storyteller can do this. So can a new kind of storytelling that is evolving and becoming popular in our society - interactive fiction and role-playing games…
Whereas traditional forms of fiction such as films, dramas, and novels simply carry you along to the author's predetermined conclusion, these newer forms create conditions in which everyone is involved creating the outcome, and the story is shaped by acts of mutual participation…The function of the content, like that of the storyteller, is to invite, inspire, and even require involvement…
When physicists state that the universe is more like a thought than a machine, that everything and everyone is at some level in touch with and affected by everything and everyone else…then we enter a world in which our individual lives and contributions can affect far more than we realize…We do not just live on the world but we live in it and with it…in interactive creative relationship. We are points of creative emergence for the world's ongoing unfoldment…it is only a matter of time until a Newer Story emerges…it is we who provide the conditions through which the New Story can live and evolve and be a creative force of vision for humanity…
The shift from one paradigm to another, one age to another, is thus not defined only by the emergence of a New Story. If that is the way we see it, we risk gaining not a New Story but a New Lecture. Instead, at this time in our history, we must perceive that this shift is also and more accurately defined as the emergence of New Storytellers, who are none other than ourselves.